|
|
Post by admin on Jun 18, 2012 21:17:50 GMT
Amongst speedway stupid rules, this is one of the worst phrases you could hope to hear  |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 26, 2012 9:07:22 GMT
But where do you draw the line?
EG...Holder v Pedersen, you know it's gonna be a tight one, they collide on lap two and one goes down, ok, restart was just a racing incident.
Off we go again and it happens again!!
We could be there all night.
|
|
|
|
Post by admin on Jun 26, 2012 11:18:23 GMT
But where do you draw the line? EG...Holder v Pedersen, you know it's gonna be a tight one, they collide on lap two and one goes down, ok, restart was just a racing incident. Off we go again and it happens again!! We could be there all night. Not if it's just an option the ref has. They never change their mind so why would we be there all night if they make an inconsistent or bad decision (as Horley did last night). It would be sensible if they didn't have to exclude someone just because the race is stopped for no real fault incidents. We pay to see four riders in a race after all  |
|
|
|
Post by Hodgy on Jun 27, 2012 9:38:34 GMT
But where do you draw the line? EG...Holder v Pedersen, you know it's gonna be a tight one, they collide on lap two and one goes down, ok, restart was just a racing incident. Off we go again and it happens again!! We could be there all night. Not if it's just an option the ref has. They never change their mind so why would we be there all night if they make an inconsistent or bad decision (as Horley did last night). It would be sensible if they didn't have to exclude someone just because the race is stopped for no real fault incidents. We pay to see four riders in a race after all Totally agree. It's not always someones fault so just put all 4 back and give the public what they want rather than pick someone. If you can have first bend bunching on lap 1, why not thereafter? Unless its a straight forward decision. |
|
