|
|
Post by Bigcatdiary on Dec 31, 2016 18:49:19 GMT
Panthers came 10th out of 13 for 2016 and much of what was said last year was said this year
Star Comments - Sadly not moving in the right direction and it's clear to see why, content wise, its fine but it needs some interior flair to set it all off.
Problem area - Interior design lets it down and it's paragraphing.
Premier League Ratings
1. Newcastle 94/100
2. Glasgow 91/100
3. Sheffield 89/100
4. Edinburgh 79/100
5. Berwick 77/100
6. Plymouth 69/100
7. Ipswich 68/100
8. Somerset 68/100
9. Redcar 63/100
10. Peterborough 62/100
11. Rye House 57/100
12. Workington 55/100
13. Scunthorpe 33/100
|
|
|
|
Post by admin on Dec 31, 2016 22:19:18 GMT
Panthers came 10th out of 13 for 2016 and much of what was said last year was said this year Star Comments - Sadly not moving in the right direction and it's clear to see why, content wise, its fine but it needs some interior flair to set it all off. Problem area - Interior design lets it down and it's paragraphing. Premier League Ratings 1. Newcastle 94/100 2. Glasgow 91/100 3. Sheffield 89/100 4. Edinburgh 79/100 5. Berwick 77/100 6. Plymouth 69/100 7. Ipswich 68/100 8. Somerset 68/100 9. Redcar 63/100 10. Peterborough 62/100 11. Rye House 57/100 12. Workington 55/100 13. Scunthorpe 33/100 So lack of sales is more down to the product itself rather than providing an accurate riding order to their customers, the paying public. |
|
|
|
Post by admin on Apr 10, 2017 7:47:50 GMT
I've bought 2 in 2017 and after a quick scan yesterday I thought that it is very Frost Bite. I didn't need to buy one yesterday but didn't get organised enough to print my own. Now that we know how teams will set up, even though it's a secret in Panthers press, I'll print a racecard as I don't read the programme when I buy one. I can cope with writing a few changes if necessary to save nearly £3. Not sure whether the 2016 problems have been addressed but if it doesn't finish higher than 2016 then the rest must be something special. Is price part of the marking criteria?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 10, 2017 8:37:28 GMT
I've bought 2 in 2017 and after a quick scan yesterday I thought that it is very Frost Bite. I didn't need to buy one yesterday but didn't get organised enough to print my own. Now that we know how teams will set up, even though it's a secret in Panthers press, I'll print a racecard as I don't read the programme when I buy one. I can cope with writing a few changes if necessary to save nearly £3. Not sure whether the 2016 problems have been addressed but if it doesn't finish higher than 2016 then the rest must be something special. Is price part of the marking criteria? You should support the club by buying the programme. It's £3 FFS. THREE POUNDS. |
|
|
|
Post by Bigcatdiary on Apr 10, 2017 9:01:47 GMT
I've bought 2 in 2017 and after a quick scan yesterday I thought that it is very Frost Bite. I didn't need to buy one yesterday but didn't get organised enough to print my own. Now that we know how teams will set up, even though it's a secret in Panthers press, I'll print a racecard as I don't read the programme when I buy one. I can cope with writing a few changes if necessary to save nearly £3. Not sure whether the 2016 problems have been addressed but if it doesn't finish higher than 2016 then the rest must be something special. Is price part of the marking criteria? You should support the club by buying the programme. It's £3 FFS. THREE POUNDS.It's actually £2.70 which it appears plays havoc with change |
|
|
|
Post by admin on Apr 10, 2017 15:29:38 GMT
I've bought 2 in 2017 and after a quick scan yesterday I thought that it is very Frost Bite. I didn't need to buy one yesterday but didn't get organised enough to print my own. Now that we know how teams will set up, even though it's a secret in Panthers press, I'll print a racecard as I don't read the programme when I buy one. I can cope with writing a few changes if necessary to save nearly £3. Not sure whether the 2016 problems have been addressed but if it doesn't finish higher than 2016 then the rest must be something special. Is price part of the marking criteria? You should support the club by buying the programme. It's £3 FFS. THREE POUNDS.The club will not fold due to programme sales and it's money that I don't need to spend. Isn't turning up regularly and paying admission over what seems a lifetime enough support. Seems to be plenty of once regular faces who no longer do that, but hopefully they bought a programme when they did attend to make up the ongoing shortfall. Anyway, it's too big for my programme board so if you want to buy me a new programme board then I'll continue to fork out the best part of £3 - can't say fairer than that  |
|
|
|
Post by admin on Apr 17, 2017 21:08:12 GMT
You should support the club by buying the programme. It's £3 FFS. THREE POUNDS.Well it is now. An Excel A4 print racecard out will do nicely instead of. |
|
