Post by admin on Mar 9, 2017 17:31:51 GMT
Having being a Crump fan from 1992 never gotten over Jason Crump being sold rather than Sullivan in 1999, I'd sort of not realised how consistently good was:
Given the strength of the leagues at that time, these are some averages (and 382 meetings
):
1994 - Ryan Sullivan 40 matches for 7.09
1995 - Ryan Sullivan 34 matches for 8.86 and 3 maximums (2 full & 1 paid)
1996 - Ryan Sullivan 39 matches for 9.01 and 7 maximums (2 full & 5 paid)
1997 - Ryan Sullivan 45 matches for 7.71 and 2 maximums (1 full & 1 paid)
1999 - Ryan Sullivan 43 matches for 9.05 and 11 maximums (8 full & 3 paid)
2000 - Ryan Sullivan 37 matches for 9.18 and two full maximums
2001 - Ryan Sullivan 40 matches for 9.52 and 9 maximums (8 full & 1 paid)
2002 - Ryan Sullivan 33 matches for 10.34 and 8 full maximums
2003 - Ryan Sullivan 28 matches for 9.23 and 4 maximums (2 full & 2 paid) 339 matches
2006 - Ryan Sullivan 43 matches for 8.23 and 5 maximums (2 full & 3 paid)
Given the strength of the leagues at that time, these are some averages (and 382 meetings
):1994 - Ryan Sullivan 40 matches for 7.09
1995 - Ryan Sullivan 34 matches for 8.86 and 3 maximums (2 full & 1 paid)
1996 - Ryan Sullivan 39 matches for 9.01 and 7 maximums (2 full & 5 paid)
1997 - Ryan Sullivan 45 matches for 7.71 and 2 maximums (1 full & 1 paid)
1999 - Ryan Sullivan 43 matches for 9.05 and 11 maximums (8 full & 3 paid)
2000 - Ryan Sullivan 37 matches for 9.18 and two full maximums
2001 - Ryan Sullivan 40 matches for 9.52 and 9 maximums (8 full & 1 paid)
2002 - Ryan Sullivan 33 matches for 10.34 and 8 full maximums
2003 - Ryan Sullivan 28 matches for 9.23 and 4 maximums (2 full & 2 paid) 339 matches
2006 - Ryan Sullivan 43 matches for 8.23 and 5 maximums (2 full & 3 paid)
